top of page

Case Study: Health Care 2022

Designing a User Friendly Search
Oncology Clinical Trial Data Base Search

             An East Coast healthcare company specializing in cutting-edge oncology treatments needed a new clinical trials search solution. As case study volumes and web traffic grew, their current platform became hard to manage, impacting both users and admins. My team was brought in to identify user pain points, align with stakeholder needs, and design a scalable, user-friendly search experience. This case study details our approach to creating a streamlined, accessible solution for patients and researchers.

Process

Collaborating with the senior engineer, we crafted a scalable solution focused on user-centric design and UX/UI best practices.

Solution

Researched, designed, tested, and refined a simple, robust search solution for the Oncology Clinical Trials Database.

  My Role

As the UX researcher, I led journey mapping, user interviews, and testing to shape a scalable, user-friendly search solution with a small cross-functional team.

Research Plan Overview

Image 32.png

Research Artifacts Crafted Preview

Image 33.png

Initial Research

A deep dive into company background, review website analytics, identify competitors, and current user experience.

1st Analytics Review - Google Analytics

2nd UX Audit - Taking inventory of UI and interactions

3rd Heuristic Evaluation - Evaluating product on N/N Group Usability Heuristics

4th Competitive Analysis - Seeking out working solutions within similar industries

5th Stakeholder Interviews - Understanding project goals, limitations, and expectations.

User Centric Approach

1:1 User Interviews

Oncology Patients = 92% of user base

Referring & Internal Physicians = 8% of user base

Physician and Patient Vin Diagram.png

User Testing

Conducted moderated and unmoderated usability testing on the clinical trial red-route to understand user behavior, engagement, pain points, and motivations.

Testing Details

Testing Type = Moderated Usability Testing 
Participants = 5 total ( 3 male, 2 Female )
Product Testing = SCC Live website (Oncology Clinical Trials)

Testing Tool = UserZoomGo

Recruiting = Client Provided Pool

Goal = In-depth look at the user journey, pain-points, motivations, and engagement with the Clinical Trials red-route.

Test Findings

  1. Users had extreme difficulty navigating the accordion menus with a 55% success rate.

  2. Interactions lead to dead-ends, 63% participants vocalized needing guidance or context.

  3. Users where looking for a search bar.

  4. Protocol #'s instead of titles caused confusion and misdirection.

  5. Very little value per-click, limited information is conveyed in general. 

  6. No clear CTA or resources to continue the experience.

Priority 1 - Critical

Priority 2 - Major

Priority 3 - Minor

Priority 1 - Critical

Priority 2 - Major

Priority 2 - Major

Empathy Mapping

Empathy maps focused on user pains, motivations, and actions, revealing benefits of improved search, defining usage patterns, and guiding direction.

Oncology Patient - Empathy Map (2).png
Referring Physician - Empathy Map (2).png

Persona Building

Questions like "Who are our users?" "What do they care about?" and "What do they expect?" guided persona building and target market identification.

Persona - Oncology Patient Iteration One - SCC (2).jpg
Persona - Referring Doctor - SCC RM (3).jpg

Information Architecture 

Current and Proposed IA (Sitemaps)

Navigation through the accordion folders was cumbersome and left users frustrated and empty-handed.

Artboard – 1.png

Proposed information architecture would remove the folders and allow a robust search bar to take over the hierarchy, simplifying engagement and access to the database of NHI Clinical Trials.

Proposed IA.png

User Flows

The clinical trial user flow was mapped to visualize the journey, identify bottlenecks, and understand user movement through the experience.

​

*User flows and sitemaps are often handed off to engineering to help develop red-routes.

User Flow.png

Design in Discovery

Sketching

Sketches were used to quickly iterate and communicate with development on future UI implementation and limitations

SCC  Search Bar Sketch with annotations.jpg

Wireframes

Wireframing began to bring the designs to life and provided a basis for feedback, iteration, and development. 

Search Page – I3.png
Search Page – I-1.png
Results.png
SERP – 9.png

Search Bar

Search Suggestions

Search Results

Results Detail Page

Collaborating with Development

My annotated wireframes are provided to the development team to build context and simplify their workflow.

SCC - Wireframes  May 4th.png

Continued Work and Hand-Off

After completing each project stage, I compiled findings into work packages for the next build phase. With stakeholders aligned and user expectations met, I transitioned to a support role as UI design and development ramped up.

marvin-meyer-SYTO3xs06fU-unsplash.jpg
bottom of page